The Archive encouraged users to upload "collections." While the official mandate was for cultural heritage, the moderators in 2005 were notoriously lax. A user could create a collection called "Classic PC Games Preservation Project" and upload a .zip file of Doom.wad , King’s Quest V , or a cracked version of Windows 95 .
They were wrong about the law. But they were right about the culture. This article is a historical analysis of user behavior and copyright norms in 2005. The Internet Archive now operates in full compliance with copyright law, and users should respect the intellectual property of rights holders. internet archive pirates 2005
Because the Archive offered and unmetered bandwidth (paid for by grants and donations), it became the perfect CDN for piracy. A user on a forum like Reddit (founded that same year) or Something Awful would post a direct link to an Archive file. The download would max out a T1 line, and the Archive footed the bill. The Archive encouraged users to upload "collections
But the scars—and the trophies—of 2005 remain. But they were right about the culture
And if you look hard enough today, deep in the un-indexed corners of archive.org , you can still find a .rar file from 2005, uploaded by "Anonymous," timestamped November 12th, with a readme that says: "Preserve this. They won't."
The Internet Archive eventually formalized what the pirates had started. Today, you can legally play thousands of DOS games directly in your browser via the "Internet Arcade" and "Console Living Room" sections. They partnered with rights holders to make the content legal retroactively.
But copyright law disagreed. The Sonny Bono Copyright Term Extension Act (1998) ensured that almost nothing from 1980 onwards was public domain in 2005. By the letter of the law, downloading Super Mario Bros. from the Archive was identical to stealing a DVD from Wal-Mart. Why didn't the FBI shut down the Internet Archive in 2005?