The Chronicles Of Peculiar Desires In The Briti... -

Flinders-Haig represents a specific British perversion: the substitution of human desire for taxonomic domination. If one cannot touch a lover, one can at least label a petal. If one cannot confess a sin, one can catalogue a stamen. The British Empire was, paradoxically, both the world’s most rigid moral structure and its largest closet. In London, Oscar Wilde was imprisoned for “gross indecency.” But in the Northwest Frontier Province of India, or the wilds of Borneo, British officers often formed what were euphemistically called “particular friendships.”

E. M. Forster’s Maurice , written in 1913 but published posthumously, hints at this geography of desire. The protagonist finds freedom not in Cambridge but in the greenwood—a pre-industrial, almost pagan Britain. Similarly, many colonial administrators found that distance from the Drawing Room allowed for peculiar arrangements. The diaries of Colonel Arthur Conyngham (1847–1923), discovered in a trunk in Gloucestershire in 2012, detail a thirty-year “domestic partnership” with a Punjabi horse trainer named Zulfiqar. The colonel’s peculiar desire was not for the exoticized “native,” but for a mundane, boring, monogamous love that the Empire’s laws rendered illegal at home but invisible abroad. The Chronicles of Peculiar Desires in the Briti...

The peculiar British desire has not vanished. It has merely mutated. It is the desire for the perfectly curated misery of The Great British Bake Off ’s soggy bottoms. It is the desire for queuing in the rain. It is the desire to say “I’m fine” when drowning. The chronicles of peculiar desires in the British Empire are not merely a register of deviance. They are the secret history of constraint. When a society tells its citizens that they must be upright, rational, and Protestant, those citizens will pour their irrational, weeping, ecstatic hearts into orchids and whips and coded diaries and crocodile wrestling. The British Empire was, paradoxically, both the world’s

Lawrence’s well-documented masochism (he paid men to beat him) was not a sideshow but the central engine of his heroism. For British public school men of his generation, raised on floggings and hymns, pain was the only legitimate conduit for intense feeling. Lawrence’s peculiar desire was to be broken by the desert, by the Turks, by his own body—because only in fragments could he feel whole. Forster’s Maurice , written in 1913 but published

This chronicle does not seek to shock. Rather, it seeks to map the secret gardens where the Empire’s most upright citizens went to wilt. To the modern eye, a Victorian collector of sea cucumbers or phrenological skulls was a harmless eccentric. But to the psychoanalytically inclined, the mania for taxonomy was a vessel for desires too dangerous to name.